Kuwait, which hosts US forces, says its defence systems intercepted missiles and drones amid sirens sounding across the country.

Save

Share

Trump seeks MoU changes as Araghchi calls deal talk ‘speculation’

Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) ⁠says it launched a retaliatory strike on a base used by US forces that it claims was used for an attack on an Iranian communications tower, as Kuwait condemned Iranian attacks on its territory.

“Following the aggression of the US army on a communication tower on Sirik Island in Hormozgan Province an hour ago, the IRGC Aerospace Force fighters targeted the airbase where the aggression originated, and the predicted targets were destroyed,” the IRGC said in a statement cited by the semi-official Fars news agency on Monday. It did not say where the base was located.

Air defences in Kuwait intercepted missiles and drones as sirens sounded across the country, the state news agency KUNA reported.

In a statement, Kuwait’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs condemned Iranian attacks on its territory.

“The Ministry affirms that the continuation and repetition of these aggressions undermine efforts aimed at de-escalating tensions and threaten security and stability in the region,” the statement said.

The attack comes after the United States said it carried out strikes on Iran this weekend in response to “aggressive Iranian actions that included the shootdown of a US MQ-1 drone that was operating over international waters”.

“US fighter aircraft swiftly responded by eliminating Iranian air defences, a ground control station, and two one-way attack drones that posed clear threats to ships transiting regional waters,” the Central Command (CENTCOM) said in a post on X, adding it will continue to protect US assets and interests during the ongoing ‌ceasefire.

CENTCOM said no US troops were hurt in the Iranian attack.

The attacks, the latest in several exchanges of fire in recent days, come as indirect negotiations between the US and Iran to build on a fragile ceasefire that took effect in April continue.

There have been mixed signals about whether the two sides are close to an agreement to extend the truce.

They have reportedly been reviewing a potential memorandum of understanding (MoU) that would extend the ceasefire for a further 60 days and begin negotiations to end the war permanently.

According to US media reports, the MoU will state that shipping through the Strait of Hormuz is to be “unrestricted”, meaning there will be no tolls, no “harassment”, and that Iran will have 30 days to remove all sea mines.

The MoU will also reportedly include a commitment from Iran not to work towards building nuclear weapons.

During the 60-day window after the agreement takes effect, the first issue to be discussed in peace talks will be Iran’s uranium enrichment programme, and how to dispose of its stock of highly enriched uranium.

US media outlet Axios reported on Sunday that the president had asked for “several amendments” to the preliminary MoU.

Iranian state media reported on Saturday that the proposed MoU included an agreement to release the country’s $12bn in frozen assets.

The report cited an “unofficial” draft of the memorandum, and a similar item carried by state TV earlier this week was dismissed by the White House as a “fabrication”.

Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil ‌Baghaei said on Monday that any delay ⁠in ⁠the diplomatic process to end the war can ⁠be explained by a lack of trust, ⁠Washington’s contradictory positions and Israel’s attacks on Lebanon, where the Israeli military is pushing a ground invasion.

The Israeli military captured Lebanon’s Beaufort Castle, a medieval hilltop fortress in the country’s south, on Sunday amid an expanded military offensive against the Lebanese armed group Hezbollah, despite a nominal ceasefire that Israel has repeatedly violated.

“Negotiations have started amid severe suspicion and mistrust, and the exchange of messages is taking place in ⁠this atmosphere,” Baghaei said.

“The other ⁠party is constantly changing its views and putting forward new ⁠or contradictory demands … it is ⁠natural that this ⁠situation will prolong negotiations,” he said, adding that Tehran viewed Israeli ‌actions in the region, including in Lebanon, as inseparable ‌from the US.

Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi wrote in a post on X that “the ceasefire between Iran and the US is unequivocally a ceasefire on all fronts, including in Lebanon“.

“Its violation on one front is a violation of the ceasefire on all fronts. The US and Israel are responsible for the consequences of any violation,” he wrote.

US President Donald Trump said in a statement on his Truth Social platform late on Sunday, Tehran “really wants to make a deal” and that whatever deal is reached will “be a good one” for the US “and those that are with us”.

He lashed out at domestic critics for “negatively ‘chirping’” about his handling of the war but made no mention of the US strikes on Iran.

“Just sit back and relax, it will all work out well in the end – It always does!” he said.